more get your war on. as always, very angry and very right on. it takes two whole panels for them to refer to the new york times as the new york times rather than "birdcage liner."

...infantile, yes, but pretty fucking true, at least on iraq.

when and how and WHY did the wall street journal suddenly become the news of record on iraq? they've been outdoing the nyt in terms of (a) scoops AND (b) scoops that are actually true AND (c) honest criticism. one has to assume that there's some sort of thick protective wall between the editorial pages and the news department.

except for this: being as the wsj are big ol' capitalist pigs, i would have to pay to read online. hence, no linkage.