26 May 2004

mea culpa

this is long overdue, and probably not as complete as it should be. for instance: where is the acknowledgement, which has been necessary for a very long time now, that the times' reliance upon the administration's information--information leaked or given in press conferences or, heck, reported by colin powell to the united nations or president bush in the state of the union--was every bit as suspect as its reliance on chalabi?